|
Principles
and Values for New Economic Systems George Porter
The following commentary and
proposals for reform are intended to set the scene for
discussions on new economic policy directions from the
local to the global. As the study and practice of
economics cuts across so many other issues of human
concern, many of the points made will also be covered in
discussion on related issues, particularly those
covering the distribution and use of natural resources.
This is presented as a
consultative draft open for positive comment.
Economic trends are moving with
increasing speed and little restraint, towards a single
global economy based on commercial monetary transactions,
speculation, take-overs, mergers and other practices to
produce ever-growing profits for those in control.
Financial transactions, having no relationship to
corresponding substantive security have created an
artificial high risk situation, placing the economy in a
state of potential instability.
The recent rapid transfer of
wealth and power from the lower and middle income groups
representing 80-90 percent of the worlds people, to
a small and diminishing elite of the excessively rich
whose fortunes continue to mount, seems an unstoppable
process in the absence of restraints on wealth
accumulation.
At the centre of the new global
economy are the transnational corporations (TNCs) and
financial institutions that have become locked into a
system dependent on growth and high-level profits, devoid
of public responsibilities.
Recognition of this situation is
vital to moving the global economy on to a path of
sustainability and social responsibility.
As the human economy determines
the use and distribution of natural resources and human
created goods and services, its expert management is the
key to the present and future human condition, as well
the health and integrity of the natural world or
ecosphere.
Management of the human economy
by government on behalf of society at all levels, is
necessary for the fair and efficient use of resources
through the production and distribution process, and to
ensure the sustainability of ecosystems. This process
must become the overriding objective of economic
management; indeed of government itself, for the collapse
of the life-support systems of the ecosphere would be
catastrophic. Such an outcome is inevitable if the
reality of this issue is not taken with the gravity it
demands.
Economic policy and directions,
therefore, must serve human and environmental needs and
those of the other life forms inhabiting the planet, so
as to ensure a just and sustainable global society.
The following paragraphs set out
the economic policy changes considered necessary to
achieve a just and sustainable society. They should be
read in conjunction with Economic
Systems - Natural and Human.
As economic policy determines
the allocation of resources and the degree of human
well-being, it is a matter for determination at the
highest level of government rather than financial and
corporate institutions that benefit from such policies.
Economic policy at all levels
must be determined and conditioned by ethical principles
that enjoy universal acceptance. This requires a major
universal paradigm shift within the next decade - a
significant change of consciousness.
Before principles and values can
be established as the basis for a new human economic
regime, the deep conflicts between the basic assumptions
underlying current market-driven neo-liberal economic
policy on the one hand, and the reality of approaching
physical limits to economic growth on the other hand,
must be recognised and resolved.
Equally significant are the
social issues of equity and justice. Despite United
Nations declarations and conventions defining human
rights, human society is moving rapidly away from civil
democracy, justice and equity as mega-business
consolidates control over the world economy.
Note: An appropriate code of
ethical conduct suitable for a basis of such a general
policy is set out in The
Ethical Imperative. This
document was assembled from a wide variety of
declarations, codes, studies and writings to represent a
broad consensus of contemporary thinking.
The following guidelines are
proposed for the formulation and operation of a new human
economic regime to meet human and biological needs.
- Respect for the integrity
of the natural world as the source and sustainer
of all life.
- Recognition that the human
economy, being dependent on the resources of the
biosphere, is a sub-set of the natural economy of
the biosphere.
- Recognition that the
biosphere is a closed system, the components of
which form a finely structured complex of
interdependent parts held together in delicate
balance.
- Acceptance that the human
economy must operate on the basis of finite
resources and closed ecosystems.
- Recognition that present
economic directions based on promotion of
sustained economic growth are incompatible with
the attainment of sustainable development and
will inevitably lead, sooner or later, to
collapse of life-support systems and extinction
of most forms of life.
Key principles and values
together with a set of rights and responsibilities should
include recognition that:
- Land, including natural
resources, provides the foundation for all life.
It is the common inheritance of humankind, passed
down by previous generations. The exercise of
both common and individual rights to land is
essential to a society based on justice. But the
rights of individuals are limited by the rights
of the community. Those who begin by denying the
existence of common rights in land end by
creating a condition of society wherein the
exercise of individual rights becomes impossible.
As members of the dominant species, each of us
has a primary responsibility to respect and
nurture the land to ensure it will continue to
provide a sufficient level of life support.
- Current land values and
profit levels are not a measure of human
contributions to society so much as reflecting
the scarcity of resources, and of human demand.
Accordingly, humans have no pre-ordained right to
sequester and claim individual ownership of land
and its resources and products. Rather, they
should adopt a stewardship role; use no more than
they themselves need; and restore to its natural
state, any damage done to the environment.
Note:
(i) The concept of
ownership of land is a relatively recent
phenomenon in human history. The move for individual
alienation came with the closure of the commons. We are
now witnessing the completion of this process through
destroying the habitat of the remaining indigenous people
living in their traditional state, and by the present
drive to privatise state assets.
(ii) Individual ownership of
land and natural resources is the root cause of much of
the major destruction of natural resources and ecosystems
in countries that lack adequate control over resources.
It also provides the means for acquiring excessive
unearned wealth by individuals and companies that have
exploited land without any corresponding contribution to
society.
- Though land should be in
the common ownership of each nation state, the
statee should make land available for productive
use on a secure long-term leased basis, at
suitable rentals and subject to acceptance of
stewardship responsibilities for its care.
- Peoples labour, both
physical, social, and intellectual, is their only
valid contribution to society, and hence the only
legitimate source of income.
Note:
This principle should not
preclude income savings and investment, but precludes
income and profits from speculation, fraud, and money
made at the expense of others. Public ownership of land
and natural resources will preclude private speculation
from changing land and property values. There need be no
impediment to private ownership of human created assets,
including buildings.
- Equity and justice demand
that each person has access to sufficient
resources and services for a reasonable standard
of life - adequate housing, food, clothing,
education, health care, community interaction and
recreation.
- Denial of access to land, a
diminishing job market due to business
restructuring, new technologies and pressure on
employees, are causing unemployment, increased
prices, idleness, deprivation and social
disorder. The concept of a basic income (BI)
needs serious public debate as the means of
meeting many growing social problems as part of a
wider package of social reforms.
- Work opportunities should
be created by public programmes through social
and community initiatives, environmental
restoration and enhancement, continuing education
and recreation.
- To reverse the rapidly
growing trend of income and wealth redistribution
favouring the small rich elite, restraints are
needed to limit top incomes and excessive capital
accumulation.
Note:
It is now common for US CEOs to
be on salaries around US$500,000 a week plus equivalent
bonuses.
- The appropriate role of the
market must be established so a balance between
the private and public interests is achieved.
Note:
(i) The effects of an unfettered
market, combined with unrestrained commercial activities
in the new environment of instant electronic
communications, have facilitated the globalisation of
economic policy and the breaking down of national
barriers. Within just a few years, this has created a
crisis situation of social, economic, and environmental
dislocation, now running out of control.
(ii) Generally, the market is a
valuable and efficient means of distribution, but its
control by cartels, monopolies and secret agreements,
restrictive practices eliminating effective competition
or loss of local control through centralisation of
economic and corporate institutions, prevent the market
from operating for the common good. Ethical practice
codes are necessary to prevent undue privilege and
corruption.
- The principles of
subsidiarity and diversity should be adopted as
guiding policy for human interaction at all
levels of decision-making. This would involve
basic structural change to minimise global scale
activity and maximise local based activity and
decision-making.
Note:
(i) Subsidiarity is a basic
democratic principle that decisions be made at the lowest
level of society as is practical and consistent with the
overall public good. No decision affecting the lives of
others should be undertaken by government without mandate
or by a corporation without authority by government
granted by charter or legislation. (See [UNKNOWN REF] of
this series.)
(ii) The PCDForum motto
"Globalise consciousness; localise economies"
encapsulates this principle.
- The size, power and
influence of corporations and financial and other
institutions, TNCs in particular, must be
contained as these latter institutions are
rapidly gaining control of the world economy,
with governments powerless to exercise control
over their own economies and the health of their
own people.
Note:
(i) Future development of this
paper will offer suggestions as to how to approach this
issue.
(ii) See also [UNKNOWN REFS]
in this series on the rise of corporate power for
specific discussion of this issue. It is particularly
relevant to the principle of subsidiarity referred to in
(j) above.
(iii) Control of the
worlds finances will be covered in a future
chapter.
- A charter for corporations
should require that they serve the long-term
public interest in a specified range of
responsibilities.
- Prices for goods and
services must be required to incorporate full
social, health and environmental costs, including
perceived intrinsic values of intact ecosystems,
and present and future resource shortages.
Note:
(i) Human production processes
are grossly inefficient in energy use. True costs and the
value of energy used are heavily discounted and passed
into the community at large as hidden costs..
(ii) Incentives are needed to
encourage efficiency in resource use and to recognise the
needs of future generations.
- Taxation systems should
reward individual contributions to society and
initiatives of social value, and penalise
activities harmful to the environment, or human
health and welfare. This would require the
replacement of income tax, both individual and
corporate by resource taxes, including land tax.
There is a range of options.
- New indicators of national
productivity and material wealth and human
well-being should replace current indicators that
reflect only the income that is measured in the
formal economy.
- The community at large,
also often bears the costs of inflation caused by
the issue of currency without substantial
security. This allows financial institutions to
gain profits at the peoples expense, nearly
always the poor and middle income earners.
- The current moves to
globalisation of the economy and private control
of economic policy need to be reversed in
accordance with the principle of subsidiarity -
in this case by a deliberate global policy of
moving control of decisions affecting
peoples lives to a local level, and in
particular, to building up the movement for
sustainable livelihoods, local economies and
local initiatives. At the same time, large
corporations and financial institutions should be
divided up into smaller units, and their
activities confined to those authorised in their
charters which need to be restricted to clear cut
functions.
- Monopolies and other
mechanisms to minimise competition must be banned
and the current trend towards profit-making at
any cost as an end in itself must be reversed.
- All companies must make a
positive contribution to society as their primary
objective. The new General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade (GATT) administered by the World Trade
Authority, has been a major step in consolidating
the move to remove restrictions on the flow of
goods, money and services between nations. It
advances the movement towards economic
centralisation and places real power in the hands
of fewer and fewer major private corporations,
institutions and those that control them. The
negative effects on the environment and the
efficient use of natural resources will be
substantial in promoting increased production and
the consumption of transport fuel at a time when
energy and other natural resources need to be
carefully nurtured in the interests of a
sustainable future. World trade policy should be
to make nations self-sufficient to the maximum
extent possible and to support exports of goods
for which nations have special advantages or
skills, are able to produce more efficiently than
others, or are surplus to local needs.
- Environmentally and
socially harmful activities should be phased out
or contained within acceptable limits - for
example international tourism, now the
worlds biggest financial sector, which is
causing critical damage to pristine ecosystems
and massive air pollution from aircraft, must be
contained well below current volumes. Logging of
primary forest should be stopped as a matter of
high priority. Energy use, particularly of fossil
fuels, must be substantially reduced as well as
long-term life threatening toxic chemicals and
other substances and technologies.
- Mega-development projects
must cease and be replaced by local, small-scale
developments initiated and supported by local
communities in line with enlightened people-based
national strategies. See An Ethical and
Philosophical Basis for Human Conduct.
- High priority is needed to
protect long-term human health by placing less
dependence on proprietary drugs and therapies,
and more on ensuring health through continuing
health monitoring and education, elimination of
toxic substances in the environment and processed
food, non-organic fertiliser, growth promotants,
chemical pesticides and other potentially harmful
substances. In particular, food production needs
to be freed from the current growing trend to
artificial and processed food, industrialisation,
standardisation and centralisation - processes
driven by economic considerations of profit
maximisation and cost minimisation regardless of
long-term human health and massive hidden
subsidies that fall indirectly on consumers.
Note:
Toxic substances in the
environment are also a threat to animal and insect life
and other bio-organisms necessary for soil health and
essential to maintenance of the natural food chain.
- A universal ban on research
and development not directed to improving the
human condition or restoring damaged ecosystems
through natural restorative processes. In
particular, bans should be placed on developing
technology based on genetic modification,
substituting natural functions by artificial
techniques or otherwise substituting the
processes of nature by artificial means.
- Research priority to be
given to seeking new, renewable energy sources.
Further research into non-renewable and nuclear
energy to be abandoned.
- A ban on all anti-human and
anti-environmental activity such as manufacture
of weapons and systems for the conduct of war;
and conflict and other acts of aggression; and
conversion of armaments industries to peaceful
purposes. All sales of armaments should be
banned.
- Controlling the growth of
cities and urban reconstruction must be high on
the list of economic priorities, particularly in
view of the increasing drift from rural areas:- a
problem related to rural poverty, land alienation
in favour of large corporations and industrial
food production.
Finally, a quote from the book Farming in Natures Image:
It is absolutely
essential for long-term survival that humankind
devise a new economic order that rewards activities
that add to the credits (resource conservation,
recycling and maintenance of resource pools,
enhancement of stabilising processes, minimisation of
waste) and discourages activities that add to the
debits (pollution, resource depletion, and disruption
of stabilising processes).
|
|